This panel of testing was developed by a bunch of doctors from Harvard. It is meant to be preventive testing prior to getting pregnant, at an affordable cost. We chose this method mostly because it is cheaper to do this panel of 100+ diseases than it is to get specifically tested for SMA. The chances of only one of us (or neither of us, which would mean it was a spontaneous mutation) being a carrier were slim, like 2% slim. But I felt like I had to know for sure. The results came back this week. The logic of probability and genetics won again. We're both carriers. I was fine for the first couple days after getting this news. But it kind of reduces the likelihood that we'll have more children. Last night I went into the attic to make sure I had all the summer clothes out for the boys in their current sizes. I saw all Vanessa's old clothes sitting in a tote and suddenly the realization that I didn't need to save them anymore hit me hard. I have always wanted another girl, and Vanessa asks frequently for a sister. It crushed my heart for just a moment that it might never happen. I pushed the thoughts away somewhere to be dealt with another day and continued my search for the here and now.
I feel like I can't bring up preventive genetic testing without bringing up the ethical issues this has. I was actually really impressed with this company because they sent me a bunch of literature to read and specifically one article discussing "Designer Babies." I have HUGE issues with the whole idea behind Designer Babies. And we won't even touch on abortion because I'm also opposed to murder and they're the same, right?! So, back to Designer Babies. Sometimes I wish Benson didn't have SMA but then I wonder how that would change him. I love Benson just the way he is and even though I wish he could run and play, I love the qualities and tenderness this trial has taught him. Would he be a different person without having body to deal with? I don't know. So if we were to have another child and decided to use IVF with PGD to ensure a child without SMA, would we be robbing that child of their trial that was meant to help them grow and become an amazing person? Are we meddling too strongly with things that only God should be left to control? Or are we using the ingenuity and technology that God gave us to "heal" that child before they are born with a fatal disease? If there were a cure for SMA, we would surely use every resource we had to make sure Benson got it, so why not use every resource to prevent it from happening? But then we are in a circle again, see questions above. The only con to these tests that I see is people finding out they could have a child with a specific disease, deciding not to do IVF, but doing amnio and getting abortions until they have a "healthy" baby. It sounds morbid in a way, but I honestly heard a woman say they were trying IVF after two failed natural conceptions. It kind of blows my mind. So what then, is the pro to the testing if there is nothing to do with the information. I guess I just like knowing. There may be some diseases where something can be done in utero, or immediately after birth to improve outcomes. I know this is the case with PKU, but I don't know much about most of the diseases. And, I won't lie, it's oddly fascinating to me to know what is lying around in my gene pool. The literature said that the average person is likely to be a carrier for 4-6 diseases. SMA is the ONLY disease I am a carrier for. Ironic, that's all I can think of.

